AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Volume 4 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.201709_4(4).0004
Cite this article
2
Download
159
Citations
396
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

ISO 9001:2015 and Its New Requirement to Address Risk: A Demonstration Case-Study

Filipe Perdigão2 Filipe Perdigão5 Celeste Jacinto6 Celeste Jacinto4 Sandra Lopes3 Sandra Lopes7 Ana Sofia Matos1 Ana Sofia Matos8
Show Less
1 Faculty of Science and Technology, PT
2 UNIDEMI – Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal, PT
3 Lusosider-aços Planos SA, Seixal, 2840-075 Aldeia de Paio Pires, Portugal, PT
4 UNIDEMI – Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal, PT
5 UNIDEMI – Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal, PT
6 UNIDEMI – Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal, PT
7 Lusosider-aços Planos SA, Seixal, 2840-075 Aldeia de Paio Pires, Portugal, PT
8 Faculty of Science and Technology, PT
Submitted: 25 September 2016 | Revised: 8 August 2018 | Accepted: 25 September 2016 | Published: 8 August 2018
© by the Authors. Licensee AccScience Publishing, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The recent 2015 edition of ISO 9001 brings an innovative risk-thinking approach in its new section 6.1. Comparing with previous editions of the standard, the main innovation is the introduction of risk analysis and identification of opportunities within quality management processes. The aim of this work was to show how the new requirements can be fulfilled. This was achieved through a case-study in an industrial company, by applying a structured analysis to a specific management process. This paper describes a practical example, demonstrating how this type of analysis can be applied to any management process within a companies’ quality system. Two methods were used; the first was Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA/FMECA), and the second was a Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP). In the latter case, the authors used the designation QF-HAZOP to highlight the fact that this is a HAZOP study applied to the analysis of Quality Functions. The work covered three vital management functions, including “Maintenance”, “Human Resources” and "Sales". In this paper, only the last one is thoroughly analysed and discussed. The methods applied allowed identifying and scrutinizing 23 specific activities (functions) associated with around 54 risk factors (failure modes). After being categorised by risk level (or hierarchy of priorities), these risk factors provided a way of finding improvement opportunities. This work shows that either FMEA/FMECA or the adapted QF-HAZOP constitute useful approaches to fulfil the new requirements of ISO 9001:2015 Quality Standard.

References
  1. Awad, A. and Yusof, S. (2012). A Methodology for Integrating Web Based FMEA and TRIZ. International Journal of Systematic Innovation (IjoSI), 2(1), 33-45.
  2. BS 5760 Part 5 (1991). Reliability of systems, equipment, and components. Guide to Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMEA and FMECA).
  3. Harms-Ringdahl, L. (2013). Guide to safety analysis for accident prevention. Stockholm, Sweden: IRS Riskhantering AB.
  4. HSE (2005). Inspectors Toolkit: Human factors in the management of major accident hazards. Health and Safety Executive, Human Factors team, HSE Books, UK.
  5. Kletz, T. A. (1999). Hazop and Hazan - Identifying and Assessing process industry hazards. 3rd edition UK: Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby.
  6. Kennedy, R. and Kirwan, B. (1998). Development of a Hazard and Operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems. Safety Science, 30(3), 249-274.
  7. ISO 9001 (2015). Quality management systems: requirements. ISO – International Standard Organization, Geneve.
  8. ISO/IEC 31010 (2009). Risk management – Risk assessment Techniques. ISO-International Organization for Standardization and IEC- International Electrotechnical Commission.
  9. Pereira, Z. & Requeijo, J. (2012). Quality Planning and Statistical Process Control. 2nd Edition. Caparica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal (in Portuguese only)
  10. Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution. 2nd Edition. Wisconsin, US: ASQC Quality Press.
  11. 10.6977/IJoSI.201709_4(4).0004
  12. Filipe Perdigão1, Celeste Jacinto1, Sandra Lopes, Ana Sofia Matos / Int. J. Systematic Innovation, 4(4), 46-55 (2017)
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing