AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Volume 5 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.201803_5(1).0003
Cite this article
7
Citations
12
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Creative conceptual design ideas for Ghost Money- Burning Tub with Design Thinking, TRIZ, and Universal Design methodology

Tien-Ting Chiu Tien-Ting Chiu Tai-Rong Lien Tai-Rong Lien Chao-Chung Chan Chao-Chung Chan
Submitted: 21 March 2017 | Revised: 8 August 2018 | Accepted: 21 March 2017 | Published: 8 August 2018
© 2018 by the Authors. Licensee AccScience Publishing, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

A burn ghost money is Taiwanese religions and cultural traditions. But burning gold paper will produce carbon dioxide, causing environmental pollution. Therefore, the aim of this study attempts to creative design concepts for a ghost money- burning tub. This study will be based on the five stages of design thinking, according to D. School, are as follows: empathy, define, ideate, prototype, and test. The research methods involved brainstorming, observational field research, systematic innovation methods (such as Mandala, Attribute Listing Technique, Cause and Effect Diagrams, Scenarios Analysis), TRIZ theory, Taiwan Patent Search System, and universal design questionnaire. Results of this study showed that a ghost money- burning tub can reduce environmental pollution. Keywords: Mandala, Attribute Listing Technique, Cause and Effect Diagrams, TRIZ

References
  1. Benyon, D. (2014). Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design (Third Ed.). UK: Pearson.
  2. Harting, A. & Kempkens, O. (2014). Getting elephants to dance. Retrieved February 15th, 2017: https://www.slideshare.net/CorporateStartupSummit/getting-elephants-to-dance
  3. Jugulum, R., & Sefik, M. (1998). Building a robust manufacturing strategy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 35 , 225 -228.
  4. Mace, R. (1997). About the center: Ronald L. Mace. Retrieved February 12th, 2017: https://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_us/usr onmace.htm
  5. Mace, R. (1998). Universal design in housing. Assistive Technology, 10(1), 21 -28.
  6. Robles, G. C., Negny, S., & Le Lann, J. M. (2009). Case -based reasoning and TRIZ: A coupling for innovative conception in Chemical Engineering. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 48 (1), 239-249.
  7. Story , M. F. (1997). 7 defining criteria: A set of seven principles developed b y the Center for Universal . Design can help designers make their designs universal. Innovation , 16(1), 29 -32.
  8. Yamashina, H., Ito, T., & Kawada, H. (2002). Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ. International Journal of Producti on Research, 40 (5), 1031 -1050.
  9. Tien-Ting Chiu, Tai -Rong Lien, Chao -Chung Chan, Tzu -Yang Chiu / Int. J. Systematic Innovation, 5(1), 18-27 (2018)
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing