AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Online First / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.202606_10(4).026140037
ARTICLE

A novel data-driven solution for sustainable irrigation: Multi-station validation of a three-variable support vector regression model in Batna, Algeria

Assia Meziani1* Nabil Mega1 Hadjer Tabboucha2
Show Less
1 New Technology and Local Development Laboratory, Department of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of El-Oued, El-Oued, Algeria
2 Department of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of El-Oued, El-Oued, Algeria
Received: 30 March 2026 | Revised: 9 June 2026 | Accepted: 19 June 2026 | Published online: 28 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Accurate evaluation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is important for effective long-term irrigation planning and water resource management in arid/semi-arid regions. This study evaluates four models: linear regression, Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy inference system, random forest (RF), and support vector regressor (SVR) to estimate daily ETo. The models were trained using ERA5-Land daily climatic variables across 24 meteorological stations in the Batna region (Algeria). To address potential temporal leakage in meteorological time series, we evaluated both random splitting (70% training, 15% validation, and 15% testing) and chronological splitting. The SVR model, utilizing only three automated features—air temperature at 2 m, soil temperature at 0–7 cm, and vapor pressure deficit—demonstrated significantly better performance than the other models at each station, with test root mean square error (RMSE) values ranging from 0.544 mm/day (Tazoult) to 0.780 mm/day (Bitam) and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values ≥ 0.91. RF showed severe overfitting, with a 164.93% increase in test RMSE. To further validate SVR’s robustness, we compared it against two additional benchmark models from the literature: a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). SVR consistently outperformed both MLP (RMSE: 0.645 mm/day) and LightGBM (RMSE: 0.612 mm/day). Therefore, the results suggest that the SVR model utilizing only three climatic features provides a highly novel, computationally efficient, and accurate platform for predicting daily ETo in arid/semi-arid Mediterranean climates, offering an operational solution for irrigation scheduling in data-scarce environments.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Reference evapotranspiration
Machine learning
FAO-56 Penman–Monteith
Semi-arid region
Algeria
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Abba, S. I., Linh, N. T. T., Abdullahi, J., Ali, S. I. A., Pham, Q. B., Abdulkadir, R. A., Costache, R., Nam, V. T., & Anh, D. T. (2020). Hybrid machine learning ensemble techniques for modeling dissolved oxygen concentration. IEEE Access, 8, 157218–157237. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017743

 

Abdullah, S. S., & Malek, M. A. (2016). Empirical Penman-Monteith equation and artificial intelligence techniques in predicting reference evapotranspiration: A review. International Journal of Water, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJW.2016.073741

 

Acharki, S., Raza, A., Vishwakarma, D. K., Amharref, M., Bernoussi, A. S., Singh, S. K., Al-Ansari, N., Dewidar, A. Z., Al-Othman, A. A., & Mattar, M. Y. (2025). Comparative assessment of empirical and hybrid machine learning models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in sub-humid and semi-arid climates. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 2542. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83859-6

 

Alexandris, S., & Kerkides, P. (2003). New empirical formula for hourly estimations of reference evapotranspiration. Agricultural Water Management, 60(3), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00172-5

 

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/4/x0490e/x0490e00.htm

 

Bellido-Jiménez, J. A., Estévez, J., & García-Marín, A. P. (2021). New machine learning approaches to improve reference evapotranspiration estimates using intra-daily temperature-based variables in a semi-arid region of Spain. Agricultural Water Management, 245, 106558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106558

 

Bouregaa, T. (2025). Trends in climatic variables and machine learning based reference evapotranspiration predictions in key cereal producing regions of Algeria. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 156(6), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05561-5

 

C3S. (2025). ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.ADBB2D47

 

Climate-Data.org. (2024). Climate data for Batna, Algeria. https://en.climate-data.org/africa/algeria/batna-1025/

 

Cobaner, M. (2011). Evapotranspiration estimation by two different neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Journal of Hydrology, 398(3–4), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.030

 

Doğan, E. (2009). Reference evapotranspiration estimation using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Irrigation and Drainage, 58(5), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.445

 

Galioto, F., Chatzinikolaou, P., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2020). The value of information for the management of water resources in agriculture: Assessing the economic viability of new methods to schedule irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 227, 105848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105848

 

Gelete, G. (2023). Application of hybrid machine learning-based ensemble techniques for rainfall-runoff modeling. Earth Science Informatics, 16(3), 2475–2495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01041-4

 

Ghiglieri, G., Buttau, C., Arras, C., Funedda, A., Soler, A., Barbieri, M., Carrey, R., Domènech, C., Torrentó, C., Otero, N., & Carletti, A. (2021). Using a multi-disciplinary approach to characterize groundwater systems in arid and semi-arid environments: The case of Biskra and Batna regions (NE Algeria). Science of the Total Environment, 757, 143797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143797

 

Gong, X., Zhang, H., Ren, C., Sun, D., & Yang, J. (2020). Optimization allocation of irrigation water resources based on crop water requirement under considering effective precipitation and uncertainty. Agricultural Water Management, 243, 106485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106264

 

Gu, Z., Qi, Z., Burghate, R., Yuan, S., Jiao, X., & Xu, J. (2020). Irrigation scheduling approaches and applications: A review. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 146(6), 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001464

 

Hamdaoui, H., Zarrouk, Y., Ankush, M. A. T., Al Kaddouri, H., Alzain, M. N., Noman, O., Nasr, F. A., & Kouddane, N. (2026). Accurate reference evapotranspiration estimation with limited data for sustainable irrigation in eastern Morocco: A machine learning approach. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, 1734366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1734366

 

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., & Thépaut, J.-N. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730), 1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803

 

Kisi, O., & Zounemat-Kermani, M. (2014). Comparison of two different adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems in modelling daily reference evapotranspiration. Water Resources Management, 28(9), 2655–2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0632-0

 

Ladlani, I., Houichi, L., Djemili, L., Heddam, S., & Belouz, K. (2012). Modeling daily reference evapotranspiration (ET₀) in the north of Algeria using generalized regression neural networks (GRNN) and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN): A comparative study. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 118(3–4), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-012-0205-9

 

Landeras, G., Bekoe, E., Ampofo, J., Logah, F., Diop, M., Cisse, M., & Shiri, J. (2018). New alternatives for reference evapotranspiration estimation in West Africa using limited weather data and ancillary data supply strategies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 132(3–4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2120-y

 

Meziani, A. (2026). Machine learning models (MLP, Random Forest, LightGBM) for daily ET₀ estimation with limited data in humid Mediterranean region (Jijel) Algeria. Veredas do Direito, 23(3), e234267. https://doi.org/10.18623/RVD.V23.N3.4267

 

Misra, A. K. (2014). Climate change and challenges of water and food security. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.04.006

 

Mohammadi, B., & Mehdizadeh, S. (2020). Modeling daily reference evapotranspiration via a novel approach based on support vector regression coupled with whale optimization algorithm. Agricultural Water Management, 237, 106145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106145

 

Morante-Carballo, F., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Herrera-Franco, G., & Apolo-Masache, B. (2022). What do we know about water scarcity in semi-arid zones? A global analysis and research trends. Water, 14(17), 2685. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172685

 

Rosegrant, M. W., Ringler, C., & Zhu, T. (2009). Water for agriculture: Maintaining food security under growing scarcity. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.030308.090351

 

Samen, S. S., Kisi, O., Al-Janabi, A. M. S., & Elbeltagi, A. (2023). Estimation of reference evapotranspiration in semi-arid region with limited climatic inputs using metaheuristic regression methods. Water, 15(19), 3449. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193449

 

Schwabe, K., Albiac, J., Connor, J. D., Hassan, R. M., & Mema, M. (2015). Drought in arid and semi-arid regions: Causes, consequences and perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6636-5

 

Sentelhas, P. C., Gillespie, T. J., & Santos, E. A. (2010). Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada. Agricultural Water Management, 97(5), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.11.005

 

Song, C., & Yao, L. (2022). A hybrid model for water quality parameter prediction based on CEEMDAN-IALO-LSTM ensemble learning. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(9), 380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10380-2

 

Tabari, H., Kisi, O., Ezani, A., & Talaee, P. H. (2012). SVM, ANFIS, regression and climate-based models for reference evapotranspiration modeling using limited climatic data in a semi-arid highland environment. Journal of Hydrology, 444–445, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.007

 

Torabi Haghighi, A., Sadegh, M., Behrooz-Koohenjani, S., Noori, R., & Klöve, B. (2020). Unsustainability syndrome—From meteorological to agricultural drought in arid and semi-arid regions. Water, 12(3), 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030838

 

Weather Spark. (2024). Average weather in Batna, Algeria. https://weatherspark.com/y/53035/Average-Weather-in-Batna-Algeria-Year-Round

 

Zereg, S., & Belouz, K. (2024). Modeling daily reference evapotranspiration using SVR machine learning algorithm with limited meteorological data in Dar-El-Beidha, Algeria. Acta Geophysica, 72(3), 2009–2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01107-3

 

Zhao, L., Xia, J., Xu, C., Wang, Z., & Sobkowiak, L. (2013). Evapotranspiration estimation methods in hydrological models. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(2), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1015-9

 

Zhou, Y., Marshall, L., Li, D., & Sharma, A. (2024). Revisiting evapotranspiration inputs in eco-hydrological modeling for climate change assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 642, 131888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131888

 

Zippenfenig, P. (2024). Open-Meteo.com Weather API (Version 1.4.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14582479

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing