AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Online First / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.202608_10(5).026280192
Cite this article
16
Download
287
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

An IMU-validated artificial intelligence framework for kinematic fatigue detection and performance assessment in table tennis training

Quanrui Ma1,2 Muhammad Nubli Abdul Wahab1*
Show Less
1 Center for Human Science, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Pekan, Pahang , Malaysia
2 Shandong Huayu University of Technology, Dezhou, Shandong , China
Received: 6 July 2026 | Revised: 3 August 2026 | Accepted: 7 August 2026 | Published online: 26 August 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

In table tennis, repeated high-speed strokes can produce measurable changes in racket acceleration, movement regularity, and technical stability, yet field-based fatigue monitoring remains difficult during normal training. This study evaluates an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based artificial intelligence framework for kinematic fatigue-compatible drift and performance assessment using the public TTSwing corpus, while specifying heart rate variability (HRV) only as a future synchronized physiological extension. The dataset contains 97,350 racket-grip swing records from 93 elite Taiwanese players collected with embedded 9-axis inertial sensors. Full-power stroke sessions were analyzed through within-session trend modeling, spectral-entropy descriptors, composite fatigue proxies, effect-size estimation, and player-independent machine-learning validation. Peak acceleration, root-mean-square acceleration, acceleration spectral entropy, and angular-velocity spectral entropy showed statistically significant but small-to-modest declines across repeated swings. These patterns are interpreted as candidate proxies for kinematic fatigue rather than direct evidence of physiological fatigue, as HRV, electromyography, perceived exertion, and coach-rated fatigue labels are unavailable. The Mechanical Fatigue Index showed strong reliability, whereas the Neuromotor Complexity Index remained exploratory. Classification results were modest and not ready for deployment in autonomous coaching decisions. The study offers a leakage-controlled IMU, evidence-based, clearer practical boundaries, and a cautious pathway for future HRV-synchronized multimodal validation in racket-sport training under controlled, prospective fatigue protocols.

Keywords
Kinematic fatigue detection
Inertial measurement units
Table tennis
Player-independent validation
Wearable sports analytics
Future heart rate variability integration
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References

Baltrušaitis, T., Ahuja, C., & Morency, L.-P. (2019). Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41(2), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2798607

 

Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

 

Bellenger, C. R., Fuller, J. T., Thomson, R. L., Davison, K., Robertson, E. Y., & Buckley, J. D. (2016). Monitoring athletic training status through autonomic heart rate regulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1461-1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0484-2

 

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

 

Brich, Q., Casals, M., Crespo, M., Reid, M., & Baiget, E. (2024). Quantifying hitting load in racket sports: A scoping review of key technologies. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 19(6), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2023-0385

 

Bourdon, P. C., Cardinale, M., Murray, A., Gastin, P., Kellmann, M., Varley, M. C., Gabbett, T. J., Coutts, A. J., Burgess, D. J., Gregson, W., & Cable, N. T. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(Suppl 2), S2-161-S2-170. https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2017-0208

 

Chang, P., Wang, C., Chen, Y., Wang, G., & Lu, A. (2023). Identification of runner fatigue stages based on inertial sensors and deep learning. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1302911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1302911

 

Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics, 21(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7

 

Chou, C.-Y., Chen, Z.-H., Sheu, Y.-H., Chen, H.-H., Sun, M.-T., & Wu, S. K. (2025a). TTSwing: A dataset for table tennis swing and racket kinematics analysis. Scientific Data, 12(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04680-y

 

Chou, C.-Y., Chen, Z.-H., Sheu, Y.-H., Chen, H.-H., Sun, M.-T., & Wu, S. K. (2025b). TTSwing: Table tennis swing and racket kinematics analysis (Version v1) [Software]. Zenodo. Accessed Date Month Year: https://zenodo.org/records/14524670

 

Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L., & Peng, C.-K. (2002). Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Physical Review Letters, 89(6), 068102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.068102

 

Delumeau, T., Deschamps, T., Plot, C., Le Carpentier, E., & Mousseau, P. (2026). Identifying neuromuscular and mental fatigue in elite youth table tennis players using machine learning. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 11812. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40324-w

 

Düking, P., Zinner, C., Trabelsi, K., Reed, J. L., Holmberg, H.-C., Kunz, P., & Sperlich, B. (2021). Monitoring and adapting endurance training on the basis of heart rate variability monitored by wearable technologies: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 24(11), 1180-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2021.04.012

 

Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The training-injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788

 

Hwang, S., Kwon, N., Lee, D., Kim, J., Yang, S., Youn, I., Moon, H.-J., Sung, J.-K., & Han, S. (2025). A multimodal fatigue detection system using sEMG and IMU signals with a hybrid CNN-LSTM-attention model. Sensors, 25(11), 3309. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113309

 

Laborde, S., Mosley, E., & Thayer, J. F. (2017). Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research: Recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213

 

Lee, Y.-J., Wei, M.-Y., & Chen, Y.-J. (2022). Multiple inertial measurement unit combination and location for recognizing general, fatigue, and simulated-fatigue gait. Gait & Posture, 96, 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.06.011

 

Li, K., Cardoso, C., Moctezuma-Ramirez, A., Elgalad, A., & Perin, E. (2023). Heart rate variability measurement through a smart wearable device: Another breakthrough for personal health monitoring? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(24), 7146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20247146

 

Marotta, L., Buurke, J. H., van Beijnum, B.-J. F., & Reenalda, J. (2021). Towards machine learning-based detection of running-induced fatigue in real-world scenarios: Evaluation of IMU sensor configurations to reduce intrusiveness. Sensors, 21(10), 3451. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103451

 

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825-2830.

 

Ramachandram, D., & Taylor, G. W. (2017). Deep multimodal learning: A survey on recent advances and trends. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(6), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2738401

 

Ravier, P., Dávalos, A., Jabloun, M., & Buttelli, O. (2021). The refined composite downsampling permutation entropy is a relevant tool in the muscle fatigue study using sEMG signals. Entropy, 23(12), 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23121655

 

Richman, J. S., & Moorman, J. R. (2000). Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 278(6), H2039-H2049. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H2039

 

Saw, A. E., Main, L. C., & Gastin, P. B. (2016). Monitoring the athlete training response: Subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094758

 

Seçkin, A. Ç., Ateş, B., & Seçkin, M. (2023). Review on wearable technology in sports: Concepts, challenges and opportunities. Applied Sciences, 13(18), 10399. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810399

 

Seong, M., Kim, G., Yeo, D., Kang, Y., Yang, H., DelPreto, J., Matusik, W., Rus, D., & Kim, S. (2024). MultiSenseBadminton: Wearable sensor-based biomechanical dataset for evaluation of badminton performance. Scientific Data, 11(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03144-z

 

Shaffer, F., & Ginsberg, J. P. (2017). An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258

 

Tu, J., Nie, Z., Neculita, M., Fortea, C., Antohi, V. M., & Meshram, S. G. (2026). Exploring advanced hybrid approaches in Hong Kong rivers for accurate prediction of surface water quality using CNN-LSTM-GRU model. Applied Water Science, 16(4), 124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-026-02779-0

 

Van Eetvelde, H., Mendonça, L. D., Ley, C., Seil, R., & Tischer, T. (2021). Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 8(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00346-x

 

Wang, W., Zhao, C., Li, X., Zhang, Z. Q., Yuan, X., & Li, H. (2023). Research on multimodal fusion recognition method of upper limb motion patterns. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3289556

 

Wei, S., & Wu, Z. (2023). The application of wearable sensors and machine learning algorithms in rehabilitation training: A systematic review. Sensors, 23(18), 7667. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187667

 

White, J., & Power, S. (2023). k-fold cross-validation can significantly over-estimate true classification accuracy in common EEG-based passive BCI experimental designs: An empirical investigation. Sensors, 23(13), 6077. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136077

 

Wu, C.-C., Chen, Y.-J., Hsu, C.-S., Wen, Y.-T., & Lee, Y.-J. (2020). Multiple inertial measurement unit combination and location for center of pressure prediction in gait. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 566474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.566474

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing